From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: x86: generalize guest_cpuid_has_ helpers
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 17:40:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3924d878-c8f1-06f7-1051-19864708211e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170802204147.3586-2-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
On 02/08/2017 22:41, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> This patch turns guest_cpuid_has_XYZ(cpuid) into guest_cpuid_has(cpuid,
> X86_FEATURE_XYZ), which gets rid of many very similar helpers.
>
> When seeing a X86_FEATURE_*, we can know which cpuid it belongs to, but
> this information isn't in common code, so we recreate it for KVM.
>
> Add some BUILD_BUG_ONs to make sure that it runs nicely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 202 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 7 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 26 +++----
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 38 +++++-----
> 6 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 172 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> index da6728383052..3b17d915b608 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>
> #include "x86.h"
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
>
> int kvm_update_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> bool kvm_mpx_supported(void);
> @@ -29,95 +30,78 @@ static inline int cpuid_maxphyaddr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return vcpu->arch.maxphyaddr;
> }
>
> -static inline bool guest_cpuid_has_xsave(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +struct cpuid_reg {
> + u32 function;
> + u32 index;
> + int reg;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct cpuid_reg reverse_cpuid[] = {
> + [CPUID_1_EDX] = { 1, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_8000_0001_EDX] = {0x80000001, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_8086_0001_EDX] = {0x80860001, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_1_ECX] = { 1, 0, CPUID_ECX},
> + [CPUID_C000_0001_EDX] = {0xc0000001, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_8000_0001_ECX] = {0xc0000001, 0, CPUID_ECX},
> + [CPUID_7_0_EBX] = { 7, 0, CPUID_EBX},
> + [CPUID_D_1_EAX] = { 0xd, 1, CPUID_EAX},
> + [CPUID_F_0_EDX] = { 0xf, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_F_1_EDX] = { 0xf, 1, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_8000_0008_EBX] = {0x80000008, 0, CPUID_EBX},
> + [CPUID_6_EAX] = { 6, 0, CPUID_EAX},
> + [CPUID_8000_000A_EDX] = {0x8000000a, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_7_ECX] = { 7, 0, CPUID_ECX},
> + [CPUID_8000_0007_EBX] = {0x80000007, 0, CPUID_EBX},
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct cpuid_reg x86_feature_cpuid(unsigned x86_feature)
> +{
> + unsigned x86_leaf = x86_feature / 32;
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(x86_leaf));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(x86_leaf >= ARRAY_SIZE(reverse_cpuid));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(reverse_cpuid[x86_leaf].function == 0);
> +
> + return reverse_cpuid[x86_leaf];
> +}
> +
> +static inline int *guest_cpuid_get_register(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned x86_feature)
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
> + struct cpuid_reg cpuid = x86_feature_cpuid(x86_feature);
>
> - if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE))
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, cpuid.function, cpuid.index);
> + if (!best)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + switch (cpuid.reg) {
> + case CPUID_EAX:
> + return &best->eax;
> + case CPUID_EBX:
> + return &best->ebx;
> + case CPUID_ECX:
> + return &best->ecx;
> + case CPUID_EDX:
> + return &best->edx;
> + default:
> + BUILD_BUG();
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +}
Wow, I didn't expect the compiler to be able to inline all of this and
even do BUILD_BUG_ON()s on array lookups. Maybe change inline to
__always_inline just to be safe?
If anybody complains we can make it just a BUG.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-04 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-02 20:41 [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: x86: generalize guest cpuid helpers Radim Krčmář
2017-08-02 20:41 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: x86: generalize guest_cpuid_has_ helpers Radim Krčmář
2017-08-04 15:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-04 20:44 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-08-04 15:40 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-08-04 20:48 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-08-02 20:41 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: x86: use general helpers for some cpuid manipulation Radim Krčmář
2017-08-03 11:53 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: x86: generalize guest cpuid helpers David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3924d878-c8f1-06f7-1051-19864708211e@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®