mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Meghana Malladi <m-malladi@ti.com>,
	Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@siemens.com>, Lee Trager <lee@trager.us>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <srk@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add ICSSG FW Stats
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:00:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3931a391-3967-4260-a104-4eb313810c0d@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250306165513.541ff46e@kernel.org>

Hi Jakub

On 07/03/25 6:25 am, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:46:08 +0530 MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>> + - ``FW_RTU_PKT_DROP``: Diagnostic error counter which increments when RTU drops a locally injected packet due to port being disabled or rule violation.
>> + - ``FW_Q0_OVERFLOW``: TX overflow counter for queue0
>> + - ``FW_Q1_OVERFLOW``: TX overflow counter for queue1
>> + - ``FW_Q2_OVERFLOW``: TX overflow counter for queue2
>> + - ``FW_Q3_OVERFLOW``: TX overflow counter for queue3
>> + - ``FW_Q4_OVERFLOW``: TX overflow counter for queue4
>> + - ``FW_Q5_OVERFLOW``: TX overflow counter for queue5
>> + - ``FW_Q6_OVERFLOW``: TX overflow counter for queue6
>> + - ``FW_Q7_OVERFLOW``: TX overflow counter for queue7
> ...
> 
> Thanks for the docs, it looks good. Now, do all of these get included
> in the standard stats returned by icssg_ndo_get_stats64 ?
> That's the primary source of information for the user regarding packet
> loss.

No, these are not reported via icssg_ndo_get_stats64.

.ndo_get_stats64 populates stats that are part of `struct
rtnl_link_stats64`. icssg_ndo_get_stats64 populates those stats wherever
applicable. These firmware stats are not same as the ones defined in
`icssg_ndo_get_stats64` hence they are not populated. They are not
standard stats, they will be dumped by `ethtool -S`. Wherever there is a
standard stats, I will make sure it gets dumped from the standard
interface instead of `ethtool -S`

Only below stats are included in the standard stats returned by
icssg_ndo_get_stats64
- rx_packets
- rx_bytes
- tx_packets
- tx_bytes
- rx_crc_errors
- rx_over_errors
- rx_multicast_frames

> 
>>  	if (prueth->pa_stats) {
>>  		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(icssg_all_pa_stats); i++) {
>> -			reg = ICSSG_FW_STATS_BASE +
>> -			      icssg_all_pa_stats[i].offset *
>> -			      PRUETH_NUM_MACS + slice * sizeof(u32);
>> +			reg = icssg_all_pa_stats[i].offset +
>> +			      slice * sizeof(u32);
>>  			regmap_read(prueth->pa_stats, reg, &val);
>>  			emac->pa_stats[i] += val;
> 
> This gets called by icssg_ndo_get_stats64() which is under RCU 

Yes, this does get called by icssg_ndo_get_stats64(). Apart from that
there is a workqueue (`icssg_stats_work_handler`) that calls this API
periodically and updates the emac->stats and emac->pa_stats arrays.

> protection and nothing else. I don't see any locking here, and

There is no locking here. I don't think this is related to the patch.
The API emac_update_hardware_stats() updates all the stats supported by
ICSSG not just standard stats.

> I hope the regmap doesn't sleep. cat /proc/net/dev to test.
> You probably need to send some fixes to net.

I checked cat /proc/net/dev and the stats shown there are not related to
the stats I am introducing in this series.

The fix could be to add a lock in this function, but we have close to 90
stats and this function is called not only from icssg_ndo_get_stats64()
but from emac_get_ethtool_stats(). The function also gets called
periodically (Every 25 Seconds for 1G Link). I think every time locking
90 regmap_reads() could result in performance degradation.

I only see couple of drivers acquiring spin lock before reading the
stats for .ndo_get_stats64. Most of the drivers are not using any lock.

I did some testing and did not see any discrepancy in the stats `cat
/proc/net/dev` without the lock.

Furthermore, the fix is independent of this patch. I can send out a
separate fix to net to add cpu locks to this function. But I don't think
there is any change needed in this patch.

Let me know what should be done here.

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Danish

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-07 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-05 11:16 MD Danish Anwar
2025-03-07  0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-07 10:30   ` MD Danish Anwar [this message]
2025-03-07 16:39     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-14  6:45       ` MD Danish Anwar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3931a391-3967-4260-a104-4eb313810c0d@ti.com \
    --to=danishanwar@ti.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=diogo.ivo@siemens.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@trager.us \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-malladi@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
    --cc=srk@ti.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®