Re: [PATCH v1] perf test: Add basic callgraph test to record testing

[James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>]

On 19/06/2025 1:24 am, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Give some basic perf record callgraph coverage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
>   tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> index 2022a4f739be..603fa6b79b5d 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> @@ -12,8 +12,10 @@ shelldir=$(dirname "$0")
>   . "${shelldir}"/lib/perf_has_symbol.sh
>   
>   testsym="test_loop"
> +testsym2="brstack"
>   
>   skip_test_missing_symbol ${testsym}
> +skip_test_missing_symbol ${testsym2}
>   
>   err=0
>   perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX)
> @@ -359,6 +361,23 @@ test_precise_max() {
>     fi
>   }
>   
> +test_callgraph() {
> +  echo "Callgraph test"
> +  if ! perf record -o "${perfdata}" -g perf test -w brstack

Looking at 2dac1f089 ("perf test: Fix 'perf script' tests on s390"), it 
looks like this won't work there. Although I'm not sure why the fix 
wasn't to change the default -g mode to dwarf on s390 if fp doesn't work 
at all. That wouldn't fix -e cpu-clock being required though.

Thanks
James