From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85E743AA4 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 20:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764102923; cv=none; b=rQbK964Gjw/iHH/MJ28XPV0j2rZzmR/MYdbABDg3CuvINi3ecUnFnRXvXXzzfpMuaJll4A4noAw8UtMAoHJnWMU/OGLdGIEvnXRVRs/w4t7T1BYP1gmIZVaZ4Bqu1YIlCVtdff47gR1xLtIDpoCCi9RUB8XfnkNsaDoKt072lDY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764102923; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kbJPO0980aWam2FNb6hvFj5YTSU2A/v7Igad62UBJjc=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=iZjTOinExoB2V8YRCVF6AM+UUSe0gGs3/pyaq+IO90L++wXP0cmRhtcF8HYRb57DT/lpi2ZGFik11rTSulQhZ3aAXfNQgdAU3/OsXEL6ffs/P//3EhglC/5HQGLqnVpHN6K98qGqWl/26ryWL2g6spZ8f02aAlW8Uk0bstCzCwo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=i0FjdvaB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="i0FjdvaB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1764102920; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Arn9IKEiNumkZmcnUiCuRi6IND+RmR9dgOgaJCzIE94=; b=i0FjdvaBsD9ERvOHBpm3hw0E+RkR+QDsgPHkSpjJ86Kh5qE8ljw1QTqPn8RaspMF27XvUe TUH/IE7SzZd0wnWLwVpuxpZ0AykdPt/oPFbGWgd3sYssQsZMoQUEDU5zZ3IH1CrDRPLCRZ VshodIGtAUICUsF7lDXdoB7aaMoxFSk= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-658-uhf9A7wZPkaGUmcoTCS21g-1; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 15:35:18 -0500 X-MC-Unique: uhf9A7wZPkaGUmcoTCS21g-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: uhf9A7wZPkaGUmcoTCS21g_1764102917 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B04A618002D1; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 20:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.14]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CB4180047F; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 20:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20251125103325.561b88615d1f0a21ddc6262d@linux-foundation.org> References: <20251125103325.561b88615d1f0a21ddc6262d@linux-foundation.org> <833c858cd74533203b43180208734b84f1137af0.camel@HansenPartnership.com> To: Andrew Morton Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, James Bottomley , linux-kernel , Blaise Boscaccy Subject: Re: [PATCH] oid_registry: allow arbitrary size OIDs Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3954439.1764102914.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 20:35:14 +0000 Message-ID: <3954440.1764102914@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 Andrew Morton wrote: > How big a problem is this in shipped kernels? Should we backport it? Not really much of a problem. The OIDs that get compiled are all listed in include/linux/oid_registry.h. External forces can't add new ones dynamically. David