From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, arnd@arndb.de,
msalter@redhat.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org,
grant.likely@linaro.org, leo.duran@amd.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [V4 PATCH 3/6] pci: Generic function for setting up PCI device DMA coherency
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 01:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3954735.qeaTp8qOcM@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431724994-21601-4-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
On Friday, May 15, 2015 04:23:11 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> This patch refactors of_pci_dma_configure() into a more generic
> pci_dma_configure(), which can be reused by non-OF code.
> Then, it adds support for setting up PCI device DMA coherency from
> ACPI _CCA object that should normally be specified in the DSDT node
> of its PCI host bridge..
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> CC: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/of_pci.c | 20 --------------------
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/of_pci.h | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_pci.c b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
> index 5751dc5..b66ee4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
> @@ -117,26 +117,6 @@ int of_get_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_get_pci_domain_nr);
>
> -/**
> - * of_pci_dma_configure - Setup DMA configuration
> - * @dev: ptr to pci_dev struct of the PCI device
> - *
> - * Function to update PCI devices's DMA configuration using the same
> - * info from the OF node of host bridge's parent (if any).
> - */
> -void of_pci_dma_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = &pci_dev->dev;
> - struct device *bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(pci_dev);
> -
> - if (!bridge->parent)
> - return;
> -
> - of_dma_configure(dev, bridge->parent->of_node);
> - pci_put_host_bridge_device(bridge);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_dma_configure);
> -
> #if defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS)
> /**
> * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 6675a7a..3c6f2e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -6,12 +6,14 @@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> -#include <linux/of_pci.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h>
> #include "pci.h"
>
> @@ -1508,6 +1510,35 @@ static void pci_init_capabilities(struct pci_dev *dev)
> pci_enable_acs(dev);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * pci_dma_configure - Setup DMA configuration
> + * @pci_dev: ptr to pci_dev struct of the PCI device
> + *
> + * Function to update PCI devices's DMA configuration using the same
> + * info from the OF node or ACPI node of host bridge's parent (if any).
> + */
> +static void pci_dma_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pci_dev->dev;
> + struct device *bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(pci_dev);
> + struct device *host = bridge->parent;
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> +
> + if (!host)
> + return;
> +
> + if (acpi_disabled) {
> + of_dma_configure(dev, host->of_node);
I'd rather do
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && host->of_node) {
of_dma_configure(dev, host->of_node);
} else {
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(host);
if (adev && acpi_dma_is_supported(adev)) {
> + } else if (has_acpi_companion(host)) {
> + adev = acpi_node(host->fwnode);
> + if (acpi_dma_is_supported(adev))
> + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, 0, NULL,
> + acpi_dma_is_coherent(adev));
> + }
> +
> + pci_put_host_bridge_device(bridge);
> +}
> +
> void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -1521,7 +1552,7 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
> dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dma_mask;
> dev->dev.dma_parms = &dev->dma_parms;
> dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = 0xffffffffull;
> - of_pci_dma_configure(dev);
> + pci_dma_configure(dev);
Also I'm not quite sure if that's actually OK.
We should be handling the DMA setup on x86 in the ACPI case already without it.
Or is this a NOP on x86?
>
> pci_set_dma_max_seg_size(dev, 65536);
> pci_set_dma_seg_boundary(dev, 0xffffffff);
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h
> index 29fd3fe..ce0e5ab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h
> @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ int of_pci_get_devfn(struct device_node *np);
> int of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin);
> int of_pci_parse_bus_range(struct device_node *node, struct resource *res);
> int of_get_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node);
> -void of_pci_dma_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev);
> #else
> static inline int of_irq_parse_pci(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct of_phandle_args *out_irq)
> {
> @@ -51,8 +50,6 @@ of_get_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node)
> {
> return -1;
> }
> -
> -static inline void of_pci_dma_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev) { }
> #endif
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS)
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-15 21:23 [V4 PATCH 0/6] ACPI: Introduce support for _CCA object Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-05-15 21:23 ` [V4 PATCH 1/6] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-05-15 23:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-18 22:38 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-05-19 0:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-20 10:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-20 11:52 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-05-20 12:04 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-21 13:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-21 13:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-15 21:23 ` [V4 PATCH 2/6] arm64 : Introduce support for ACPI _CCA object Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-05-16 11:48 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-16 16:50 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-05-20 10:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-20 11:51 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-05-15 21:23 ` [V4 PATCH 3/6] pci: Generic function for setting up PCI device DMA coherency Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-05-15 23:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2015-05-16 15:12 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2015-05-20 9:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-20 9:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-20 9:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-20 12:00 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-05-20 12:02 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-20 20:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-20 9:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-16 12:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-16 15:14 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2015-05-15 21:23 ` [V4 PATCH 4/6] device property: Introduces device_dma_is_coherent() Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-05-20 10:28 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-20 21:32 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-05-15 21:23 ` [V4 PATCH 5/6] crypto: ccp - Unify coherency checking logic with device_dma_is_coherent() Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-05-15 21:23 ` [V4 PATCH 6/6] amd-xgbe: " Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3954735.qeaTp8qOcM@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.duran@amd.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®