From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6144C98; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761641137; cv=none; b=llBuZHFQPVTaCBN5wgT2zg361RHVwEbnHNegrNNY/zow33XXJikJZc+rAnQOtpZhmTMFa1aoaBV3QPP4RlCWyizvTN9ujCEQQuEUoHstx7mQ4CEnPbpBxvOZFLR/HXNUpb0MU4khHCLOKZEBpXxKgsQs/YQikzEMH1LF8tuj4u8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761641137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AzfMJnxDlLOurBkOwjsFhj7GPFZLhxcijnAWsYYiWpE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=q+zU9VDbl2vpsCmI82JVzQciI0OLAaxWUfjinIm6bHnwCnPqw5IkcGMkYz5t2hA25Fcz13AkZmPjd+Jnvgq0AUwEd1UWunlrUAuHtjTLaP8mea2dmQl0Y4galOPRtOdfQlQ1Ek0aTzl6SK/FTQfKYERASkdDFR5iY/lcan1+Vj0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=X0nD8Ef8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="X0nD8Ef8" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1761641133; bh=AzfMJnxDlLOurBkOwjsFhj7GPFZLhxcijnAWsYYiWpE=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=X0nD8Ef80li5RM/i0fesne7rsefbId77wgY5dQqPZ/+p46Npgi57Ixd6Clyo7K2En w+WmhFsu8DfyMvJLLF0/CYBB2aHJGFT7o1tpkjytMnM+rEGd/EiS0pd7gH01iUwkjv cKAjWSdV3D7EUoM8L83giRV2z4BxkTCeCxfMGOBU7jZ6YDL4d3Vq+YSU2molrl250P Jrxgx608OPhy4RzzFhSiSQedfHWcqDSH9xkZUoxaM+DZ6GrB92cPEvvLezPZRfphOM KHdPeOmFbZflKFvYSe4CpHUzQrV26EWCq+Pw1al9OBUwAo0dU6sx14lbpD7NVdwXYa +d+5i9L2Oxwwg== Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F070F17E126B; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:45:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <39602d94-7f2e-42b1-a77e-1d5a3e032277@collabora.com> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:45:32 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7988a: Add label for ssusb0 To: frank-w@public-files.de, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Wunderlich , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Linus Walleij , Matthias Brugger Cc: Sean Wang , Daniel Golle , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20251027132817.212534-1-linux@fw-web.de> <20251027132817.212534-4-linux@fw-web.de> <35504988-448e-4a5c-8ea6-769c06117c01@kernel.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Il 27/10/25 20:04, Frank Wunderlich ha scritto: > Am 27. Oktober 2025 19:58:23 MEZ schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski : >> On 27/10/2025 14:28, Frank Wunderlich wrote: >>> From: Frank Wunderlich >>> >>> Add label for ssusb0 node which is used for BPI-R4-Pro. >> >> This makes no sense on its own. We do not add labels because they have 0 >> impact. >> >> Please drop or squash. > > Thank you for the review. > > I reference this label in part 4 and tried to separate > changes in soc dtsi and board layer. > But of course i can squash this to part 4. > >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof > > > regards Frank Yes, please squash this to the patch where you actually use the label. Cheers, Angelo