From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@gmail.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: SME: BSP/SME microcode update fix
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:26:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39709df3-fd62-28d6-9e78-94681b393ac9@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbab2c46-52b7-dfb4-e11a-153f8064382f@gmail.com>
On 1/10/2018 3:14 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
> On 10.01.2018 20:25, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>
> Hi Tom ,
>
>> This patch series addresses an issue when SME is active and the BSP
>> is attempting to check for and load microcode during load_ucode_bsp().
>> Since the initrd has not been decrypted (yet) and the virtual address
>> of the initrd treats the memory as encrypted, the CPIO archive parsing
>> fails to locate the microcode.
>>
>> This series moves the encryption of the initrd into the early boot code
>> and encrypts it at the same time that the kernel is encrypted. Since
>> the initrd is now encrypted, the CPIO archive parsing succeeds in
>> properly locating the microcode.
>>
>> The following patches are included in this fix:
>> - Cleanup register saving in arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S
>> - Reduce parameters and complexity for creating the SME PGD mappings
>> - Centralize the use of the PMD flags used in sme_encrypt_kernel() in
>> preparation for using PTE flags also.
>> - Prepare sme_encrypt_kernel() to handle PAGE aligned encryption, not
>> just 2MB large page aligned encryption.
>> - Encrypt the initrd in sme_encrypt_kernel() when the kernel is being
>> encrypted.
>>
>> This patch series is based on tip/master.
>
> Is something in tip/master the patch serie need ?
That's just how I have to submit the patches. You could try applying them
onto whatever tree you like, I don't imagine any conflicts would be too
difficult to resolve if you encounter any.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> I would like to test the serie however tip/master
> breaks my box.. On tip/master there is no way to boot
> with mem_crypt=on with or without your patches.
>
> With mem_crypt=off the box at least boots to a point , seems APCI breaks
> on tip/master.
>
> If someone want to take a look , a dmesg of the broken boot can be found
> there:
>
> http://sigsegv.24-7.ro/~crazy/tip-master/dmesg-tip-master.txt
>
> Regards,
>
> Gabriel C
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 19:25 Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] x86/mm: Cleanup register saving in mem_encrypt_boot.S Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:38 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Clean up register saving in the __enc_copy() assembly code tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for SME PGD mapping Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:38 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/mm: Centralize PMD flags in sme_encrypt_kernel() Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:39 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/mm: Prepare sme_encrypt_kernel() for PAGE aligned encryption Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:39 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] x86/mm: Encrypt the initrd earlier for BSP microcode update Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:40 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: SME: BSP/SME microcode update fix Gabriel C
2018-01-10 21:26 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2018-01-10 22:20 ` Gabriel C
2018-01-11 18:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-15 22:47 ` Gabriel C
2018-01-19 15:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 15:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-19 15:27 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 15:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-19 15:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-19 15:56 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 16:02 ` Gabriel C
2018-01-19 17:15 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 15:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39709df3-fd62-28d6-9e78-94681b393ac9@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nix.or.die@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®