From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Robbie King <robbiek@xsightlabs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] mailbox: pcc: Always clear the platform ack interrupt first
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:45:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <397910e0-38eb-553a-2bd2-c338d8c3a49c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250303-pcc_fixes_updates-v1-2-3b44f3d134b1@arm.com>
在 2025/3/3 18:51, Sudeep Holla 写道:
> The PCC mailbox interrupt handler (pcc_mbox_irq()) currently checks
> for command completion flags and any error status before clearing the
> interrupt.
>
> The below sequence highlights an issue in the handling of PCC mailbox
> interrupts, specifically when dealing with doorbell notifications and
> acknowledgment between the OSPM and the platform where type3 and type4
> channels are sharing the interrupt.
>
> Platform Firmware OSPM/Linux PCC driver
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> build message in shmem
> ring type3 channel doorbell
> receives the doorbell interrupt
> process the message from OSPM
> build response for the message
> ring the platform ack interrupt to OSPM
> --->
> build notification in type4 channel
> start processing in pcc_mbox_irq()
> enter pcc handler for type4 chan
> command complete cleared
> read the notification
> <--- clear platform ack irq
> * no effect from above as platform ack irq *
> * not yet triggered on this channel *
> ring the platform ack irq on type4 channel
> --->
> leave pcc handler for type4 chan
> enter pcc handler for type3 chan
> command complete set
> read the response
> <--- clear platform ack irq
> leave pcc handler for type3 chan
> leave pcc_mbox_irq() handler
> start processing in pcc_mbox_irq()
> enter pcc handler for type4 chan
> leave pcc handler for type4 chan
> enter pcc handler for type3 chan
> leave pcc handler for type3 chan
> leave pcc_mbox_irq() handler
This is not easy to understand to me.
The issue as below described is already very clear to me.
So suggest remove above flow graph.
> The key issue occurs when OSPM tries to acknowledge platform ack
> interrupt for a notification which is ready to be read and processed
> but the interrupt itself is not yet triggered by the platform.
>
> This ineffective acknowledgment leads to an issue later in time where
> the interrupt remains pending as we exit the interrupt handler without
> clearing the platform ack interrupt as there is no pending response or
> notification. The interrupt acknowledgment order is incorrect.
Has this issue been confired? It's more better if has the log.😁
But it seems a valid issue.
>
> To resolve this issue, the platform acknowledgment interrupt should
> always be cleared before processing the interrupt for any notifications
> or response.
AFAIC,always clearing the platform ack interrupt first which is also the
communication flow as ACPI spec described.
I am not sure if it is ok when triggering interrupt and clearing
interrupt occur concurrently.
But this scenario is always possible. I think It doesn't matter with
this patch. It's just my confusion.
>
> Reported-by: Robbie King <robbiek@xsightlabs.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Lgtm,
Reviewed-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> index f2e4087281c70eeb5b9b33371596613a371dff4f..4c582fa2b8bf4c9a9368dba8220f567555dba963 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,10 @@ static irqreturn_t pcc_mbox_irq(int irq, void *p)
> int ret;
>
> pchan = chan->con_priv;
> +
> + if (pcc_chan_reg_read_modify_write(&pchan->plat_irq_ack))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> if (pchan->type == ACPI_PCCT_TYPE_EXT_PCC_MASTER_SUBSPACE &&
> !pchan->chan_in_use)
> return IRQ_NONE;
> @@ -330,9 +334,6 @@ static irqreturn_t pcc_mbox_irq(int irq, void *p)
> return IRQ_NONE;
> }
>
> - if (pcc_chan_reg_read_modify_write(&pchan->plat_irq_ack))
> - return IRQ_NONE;
> -
> /*
> * Clear this flag immediately after updating interrupt ack register
> * to avoid possible race in updatation of the flag from
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 10:51 [PATCH 00/14] mailbox: pcc: Fixes and cleanup/refactoring Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 01/14] mailbox: pcc: Fix the possible race in updation of chan_in_use flag Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 02/14] mailbox: pcc: Always clear the platform ack interrupt first Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 3:45 ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2025-03-05 14:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-06 3:44 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 03/14] mailbox: pcc: Drop unnecessary endianness conversion of pcc_hdr.flags Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 4:02 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-05 10:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 10:36 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-06 3:50 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 04/14] mailbox: pcc: Return early if no GAS register from pcc_mbox_cmd_complete_check Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 5:57 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 05/14] mailbox: pcc: Use acpi_os_ioremap() instead of ioremap() Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 06/14] mailbox: pcc: Refactor error handling in irq handler into separate function Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 6:09 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-05 10:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 07/14] mailbox: pcc: Move pcc_mbox_ioremap() before pcc_mbox_request_channel() Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 6:48 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-05 10:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 13:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 08/14] mailbox: pcc: Always map the shared memory communication address Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 6:54 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-05 11:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 09/14] mailbox: pcc: Refactor and simplify check_and_ack() Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 10/14] soc: hisilicon: kunpeng_hccs: Simplify PCC shared memory region handling Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 7:14 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-05 11:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-06 3:55 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-06 9:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 11/14] i2c: xgene-slimpro: " Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 12/14] hwmon: (xgene-hwmon) " Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 13:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-03-03 15:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 13/14] ACPI: PCC: " Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 10:51 ` [PATCH 14/14] ACPI: CPPC: " Sudeep Holla
2025-03-03 12:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=397910e0-38eb-553a-2bd2-c338d8c3a49c@huawei.com \
--to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robbiek@xsightlabs.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®