From: Raphael Schmid <Raphael_Schmid@CUBUS.COM>
To: "'Stefan Reinauer'" <stepan@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: AW: Bootscreen
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:18:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <398E93A81CC5D311901600A0C9F2928946938E@cubuss2> (raw)
> > Sure some of the kernel's output could be cleaned up a
> > little, but for the most part its not "geeky" - its useful and
> > informative.
> They are geeky, but useful - If you got a system that causes trouble.
> Otherwise, if your system works right, they are just some more bits
> flickering on your screen.
I was the one who began with "geeky". Sorry for that, was probably a
bit ... well, strong.
> Why oh why do we always need to compare ourselfes to Windows. "Windows
> does this, windows does that" Whatever.. that is of no relevance. And if
> it was QNX or RTOS we are cloning and the thing we cloned is a good
> idea, what shalls...? It seems to me that everything that lacks the
> status quo in kernel message visability is a windows clone?
That what I wanted to say with "Can we get rid of the "stupid guy who's
trying to clone Windows" dogma, please?". Yours are more appropriate words.
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-28 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-28 15:18 Raphael Schmid [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-29 14:01 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-29 11:56 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-29 12:33 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-01-29 13:54 ` John Bradford
2003-01-29 15:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-01-29 14:00 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-01-28 14:58 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-28 15:52 ` Stephen Wille Padnos
2003-01-28 17:05 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-28 14:53 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-28 18:21 ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-01-28 14:51 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-28 14:48 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-28 15:41 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-01-28 14:47 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-29 10:10 ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-29 10:18 ` John Bradford
2003-01-29 15:16 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-28 14:46 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-28 14:11 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-28 14:26 ` John Bradford
2003-01-28 14:29 ` Robert Morris
2003-01-28 12:52 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-28 10:01 Raphael Schmid
2003-01-28 10:32 ` John Bradford
2003-01-28 10:45 ` Alex Riesen
2003-01-28 9:57 Raphael Schmid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=398E93A81CC5D311901600A0C9F2928946938E@cubuss2 \
--to=raphael_schmid@cubus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stepan@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®