From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757750AbcASXtq (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:49:46 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38158 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754244AbcASXtj (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:49:39 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <20160117103337.GC8549@pd.tnic> <20160118181457.GG12651@pd.tnic> <20160118183921.GH12651@pd.tnic> <569D40CE.5090506@zytor.com> <20160118230554.GJ12651@pd.tnic> <3D4E057B-AB03-4C12-B59D-774E8954C742@zytor.com> <20160118232547.GK12651@pd.tnic> <20160119135714.GD15071@pd.tnic> <20160119231021.GG15071@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: static_cpu_has_safe: discard dynamic check after init From: Boris Petkov Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:49:28 +0100 To: Andy Lutomirski CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , Brian Gerst , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Denys Vlasenko , Linus Torvalds Message-ID: <3997c222-9ef0-4a24-88b2-f149e23891c6@email.android.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andy Lutomirski wrote: >Is this on top of Brian's patch? I think we should do both or >neither. Of course. I'll prep a branch tomorrow for the build bot to smoke-test. -- Sent from a small device: formatting sux and brevity is inevitable.