mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Probing devices by their less-specific "compatible" bindings (here: brcmnand)
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:02:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <399d2f43-5cad-6c51-fe3a-623950e2151a@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi, I just spent few hours debugging hidden hw lockup and I need to
consult driver core code behaviour.

I have a BCM4908 SoC based board with a NAND controller on it.


### Hardware binding

Hardware details:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcmbca/bcm4908.dtsi

Relevant part:
nand-controller@1800 {
	compatible = "brcm,nand-bcm63138", "brcm,brcmnand-v7.1", "brcm,brcmnand";
	reg = <0x1800 0x600>, <0x2000 0x10>;
	reg-names = "nand", "nand-int-base";
}:

Above binding is based on the documentation:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.yaml


### Linux drivers

Linux has separated drivers for few Broadcom's NAND controller bindings:

1. drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcm63138_nand.c for:
brcm,nand-bcm63138

2. drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c for:
brcm,brcmnand-v2.1
brcm,brcmnand-v2.2
brcm,brcmnand-v4.0
brcm,brcmnand-v5.0
brcm,brcmnand-v6.0
brcm,brcmnand-v6.1
brcm,brcmnand-v6.2
brcm,brcmnand-v7.0
brcm,brcmnand-v7.1
brcm,brcmnand-v7.2
brcm,brcmnand-v7.3

3. drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmstb_nand.c for:
brcm,brcmnand


### Problem

As first Linux probes my hardware using the "brcm,nand-bcm63138"
compatibility string driver bcm63138_nand.c. That's good.

It that fails however (.probe() returns an error) then Linux core starts
probing using drivers for less specific bindings.

In my case probing with the "brcm,brcmnand" string driver brcmstb_nand.c
results in ignoring SoC specific bits and causes a hardware lockup. Hw
isn't initialized properly and writel_relaxed(0x00000009, base + 0x04)
just make it hang.

That obviously isn't an acceptable behavior for me. So I'm wondering
what's going on wrong here.

Should Linux avoid probing with less-specific compatible strings?
Or should I not claim hw to be "brcm,brcmnand" compatible if it REQUIRES
SoC-specific handling?

An extra note: that fallback probing happens even with .probe()
returning -EPROBE_DEFER. This actually smells fishy for me on the Linux
core part.
I'm not an expect but I think core should wait for actual error without
trying less-specific compatible strings & drivers.

             reply	other threads:[~2023-03-17 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-17 10:02 Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2023-03-17 14:19 ` Tudor Ambarus
2023-03-17 14:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-03-17 21:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-03-18  0:24   ` William Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=399d2f43-5cad-6c51-fe3a-623950e2151a@gmail.com \
    --to=zajec5@gmail.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®