From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756034AbZB0NKw (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:10:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752078AbZB0NKn (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:10:43 -0500 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:30346 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751598AbZB0NKm convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:10:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=oQMny9Uf5ShQsTEXzCWmt34F1ii7sbM9l9AsBKBh7h1+16dJzb6kbreIOl+9CV6gG3 ZbYFtvvqoQu6TWJVA9nWDvTNoPZ9GK55rm6cDKBrg/mNcPh1f2fqEYdV+/CEcuKNpZ3b fjpS1LH+tlqfP8X1QZy24xDl+rIqTH/ujJp0o= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090227171215.1557.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20090227123806.1537.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <1235722003.4948.1324.camel@laptop> <20090227171215.1557.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:10:39 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0d6b7c6a15a50b07 Message-ID: <39e6f6c70902270510l1191b500q51427c16722cf6ac@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] new irq tracer From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Dominique Toupin , Mathieu Desnoyers , Frederic Weisbecker , Jason Baron , Masami Hiramatsu , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:13 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 16:48 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> >> > I mean make the patch of mathieu's plan and mesure it. Then >> > we can mesure number by number. my number mean, >> > >> >   (1) How much increasing line and messiness >> >   (2) How much improving latency >> > >> > that's fairly comparision and typical lkml discussion style, imho. >> > >> > What do you think? >> >> Patches are welcome ;-) > > Why sad face? Am I talking about funny thing? Nope, its just that the way you're talking is looking too managerial. IOW, instead of proposing measurements, do them and show the results, how does that sound? And ;-) is not a sad face in my dictionary, but an ironic one :-) - Arnaldo