From: Michael Rothwell <rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Dag Brattli <dagb@fast.no>
Subject: Re: [RANT] Linux-IrDA status
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:08:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A08DFCF.49845763@holly-springs.nc.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011072030070.15254-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Linus, can you post reasons why you keep ignoring^W rejecting the IrDA
> > patch?
>
> Basically, whatever Alan rants, I've not seen the patches all that many
> times at all.
>
> Also, I've never seen much in the form of explanation, and at least the
> last patch I saw just the first screenful was so off-putting that I just
> went "Ok, I have real bugs to fix, I don't need this crap".
>
> Linus
Like what? I'm not sure what you're saying here. It seems that the pople
writing the IrDA code have gotten no feedback from you as to why their
patch is never accepted -- could you clarify? They're apparently putting
a lot of effort into writing and fixing IrDA for Linux, and have become
very discouraged at the lack of feedback. "Crap" the code may be, but it
seems like it would be a good idea to at least say something substantive
about why their code keeps getting rejected.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-08 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011072030070.15254-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
2000-11-08 5:08 ` Michael Rothwell [this message]
2000-11-08 5:23 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <20001109192404.B25828@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
2000-11-10 3:50 ` The IrDA patches !!! (+ more flames) Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-10 19:56 ` The IrDA patches !!! (was Re: [RANT] Linux-IrDA status) Linus Torvalds
2000-11-10 21:25 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-12 2:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-11-12 3:12 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-11 12:04 ` Horst von Brand
2000-11-08 7:26 ` [RANT] Linux-IrDA status Linus Torvalds
2000-11-08 8:14 ` Russell King
2000-11-08 12:15 ` [RANT] Linux-IrDA status, " Dag Brattli
2000-11-10 21:24 ` Pavel Machek
2000-11-08 12:31 ` Michael Rothwell
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011072027520.15254-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
[not found] ` <200011081204.MAA68767@tepid.osl.fast.no>
2000-11-08 18:20 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-08 1:14 Jean Tourrilhes
[not found] ` <3A08AB56.10BD5007@mandrakesoft.com>
2000-11-08 1:38 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-08 8:12 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A08DFCF.49845763@holly-springs.nc.us \
--to=rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dagb@fast.no \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®