From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 21:14:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 21:14:41 -0500 Received: from isis.its.uow.edu.au ([130.130.68.21]:50605 "EHLO isis.its.uow.edu.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 21:14:33 -0500 Message-ID: <3A2C493C.4A321797@uow.edu.au> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 12:47:40 +1100 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test8 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Viro CC: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks In-Reply-To: <3A2B9B39.AA240475@uow.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro wrote: > > OK, guys, I think I've got it: Yes, you have. Two machines, four hours, zero failures. This is with - test12-pre4 - aviro bforget patch - UnlockPage() removed from vmscan.c:623 - and --- linux-2.4.0-test12-pre4/fs/ext2/inode.c Mon Dec 4 21:07:12 2000 +++ linux-akpm/fs/ext2/inode.c Tue Dec 5 08:46:38 2000 @@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ raw_inode->i_block[0] = cpu_to_le32(kdev_t_to_nr(inode->i_rdev)); else for (block = 0; block < EXT2_N_BLOCKS; block++) raw_inode->i_block[block] = inode->u.ext2_i.i_data[block]; - mark_buffer_dirty_inode(bh, inode); + mark_buffer_dirty(bh); if (do_sync) { ll_rw_block (WRITE, 1, &bh); wait_on_buffer (bh); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/