From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:19:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:19:45 -0500 Received: from [64.64.109.142] ([64.64.109.142]:772 "EHLO quark.didntduck.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:19:32 -0500 Message-ID: <3A5CC3A1.3D8F6BF3@didntduck.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:18:41 -0500 From: Brian Gerst X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mo6 CC: Robert Kaiser , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? In-Reply-To: <01010922090000.02630@rob> <3A5B7F76.ABDFED7A@didntduck.org> <01010922264400.02737@rob> <20010110205127.B982@pandora.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org mo6 wrote: > I dug up an old amd 386 and started compiling kernels for it with gcc 2.95.2: > > 2.4.0 : doesn't boot, same symptoms as you, Robert, so you're not imagining > things :-) > 2.2.19pre6 : compiles, boots and runs poifectly > 2.3.51 : doesn't compile > 2.3.99-pre1 : hrm, *cough* > 2.3.99-pre2 : *tsjoum* > 2.3.39: compiles and boots okay > > here is where I got bored :-) > > okay, anyone, which 2.3.x kernels should compile okay ? move up to 2.4.0-testX kernels -- Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/