From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:04:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:04:37 -0500 Received: from isis.its.uow.edu.au ([130.130.68.21]:60597 "EHLO isis.its.uow.edu.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:04:28 -0500 Message-ID: <3A5FB925.1CE6B229@uow.edu.au> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:10:45 +1100 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Manfred Spraul , Frank de Lange , dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@transmeta.com, Donald Becker Subject: Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware In-Reply-To: <3A5F5BFB.69134DB9@colorfullife.com> from "Manfred Spraul" at Jan 12, 2001 08:33:15 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > Could you disable both bandaids? I disabled them, no problems so far. > > Now back to the disable_irq_nosync(). > > Ok so it looks like the disable_irq code is buggy. Unfortunately its not > just used for these drivers they are just the heaviest users. > > Given that we can see the IRQ is still set on the APIC can we fake an IRQ in > that condition ? As you think about this problem, please bear in mind that this loss of APIC interrupts also occurs in 2.2 kernels. Donald may have more details. - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/