From: "Bobby D. Bryant" <bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Slowdown for ATA/100 drive on PCI card, after 2.4.3upgrade.
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 07:41:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ADC3A00.A9954E08@mail.utexas.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104171408050.20942-100000@zigo.dhs.org>
Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > try and avoid a hardware problem. VIA have finally released an 'official'
> > fix which seems to be a lot less damaging to performance on the whole. That
> > I hope will be in 2.4.4
>
> What is this official fix? I've only seen unofficial ones (like the one in
> your ac7, or was it ac6). What are the implications of the fix
> (compabilitywise and speedwise)?
>
> I looked on via's homepage but could not find anything about this fix.
> I've very interested since I have a new mobo unopened in a box that I can
> still return and choose something with another chipset.
Notice that with 2.4.3 it *only* affects the disk on the PCI controller card; a
similar ATA/100 disk on the motherboard's controller did not experience the
slowdown.
Also, FYI, I noticed the mention of VIA fixes in the -ac7 change list, but those
changes did not cause or fix this particular problem. The problem occurs in all
the 2.4.3's that I've tried: -ac5, -ac6, -ac7.
BTW, It's not hurting me right now, because the disk on the PCI card hasn't been
put to work yet. I just want to make sure you guys are aware of it.
Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-17 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-16 13:14 PROBLEM: Slowdown for ATA/100 drive on PCI card, after 2.4.3 upgrade Bobby D. Bryant
2001-04-17 11:33 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-17 12:13 ` Dennis Bjorklund
2001-04-17 12:41 ` Bobby D. Bryant [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ADC3A00.A9954E08@mail.utexas.edu \
--to=bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=db@zigo.dhs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®