mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: schedule() seems to have changed.
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 09:25:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ADDC00A.2DFE366F@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1010418102332.1771A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>

"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
> 
> It seems that the nature of schedule() has changed in recent
> kernels. I am trying to update my drivers to correspond to
> the latest changes. Here is an example:
> 
> This waits for some hardware (interrupt sets flag), time-out in one
> second. This is in an ioctl(), i.e., user context:
> 
>     set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>     current->policy = SCHED_YIELD;
>     timer = jiffies + HZ;
>     while(time_before(jiffies, timer))
>     {
>         if(flag) break;
>         schedule();
>     }
>     set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> 
> The problem is that schedule() never returns!!! If I use
> schedule_timeout(1), it returns, but the granularity
> of the timeout interval is such that it slows down the
> driver (0.1 ms).
> 
> So, is there something that I'm not doing that is preventing
> schedule() from returning?  It returns on a user-interrupt (^C),
> but otherwise gives control to the kernel forever.
> 
When schedule() is entered with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (actually with
current state !=TASK_RUNNING) it takes the task out of the run_list.  It
has been this way for a long time.  The normal way for the task to move
back to the run_list is for wake_up to be called, which, of course (^C)
does.  In your case it would be best if you could get what ever sets
"flag" to call wake_up.

If what you really want to do is to spin in a SCHED_YIELD waiting for
"flag" you need to a.) move the setting of SCHED_YIELD inside the while,
and b.) eliminate the setting of current_state (both of them).

George

  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-18 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-18 14:26 Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-18 16:25 ` george anzinger [this message]
2001-04-18 16:44   ` Richard B. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ADDC00A.2DFE366F@mvista.com \
    --to=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®