From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: schedule() seems to have changed.
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 09:25:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ADDC00A.2DFE366F@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1010418102332.1771A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
>
> It seems that the nature of schedule() has changed in recent
> kernels. I am trying to update my drivers to correspond to
> the latest changes. Here is an example:
>
> This waits for some hardware (interrupt sets flag), time-out in one
> second. This is in an ioctl(), i.e., user context:
>
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> current->policy = SCHED_YIELD;
> timer = jiffies + HZ;
> while(time_before(jiffies, timer))
> {
> if(flag) break;
> schedule();
> }
> set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>
> The problem is that schedule() never returns!!! If I use
> schedule_timeout(1), it returns, but the granularity
> of the timeout interval is such that it slows down the
> driver (0.1 ms).
>
> So, is there something that I'm not doing that is preventing
> schedule() from returning? It returns on a user-interrupt (^C),
> but otherwise gives control to the kernel forever.
>
When schedule() is entered with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (actually with
current state !=TASK_RUNNING) it takes the task out of the run_list. It
has been this way for a long time. The normal way for the task to move
back to the run_list is for wake_up to be called, which, of course (^C)
does. In your case it would be best if you could get what ever sets
"flag" to call wake_up.
If what you really want to do is to spin in a SCHED_YIELD waiting for
"flag" you need to a.) move the setting of SCHED_YIELD inside the while,
and b.) eliminate the setting of current_state (both of them).
George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-18 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-18 14:26 Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-18 16:25 ` george anzinger [this message]
2001-04-18 16:44 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ADDC00A.2DFE366F@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®