From: Zdenek Kabelac <kabi@i.am>
To: Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@f-secure.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Thread core dumps for 2.4.4
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 15:22:00 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AF6BD98.59F714DF@i.am> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105061833220.16238-100000@fs131-224.f-secure.com>
Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2001, Don Dugger wrote:
>
> > The attached patch allows core dumps from thread processes in the 2.4.4
> > kernel. This patch is the same as the last one I sent out except it fixes
> > the same bug that `kernel/fork.c' had with duplicate info in the `mm'
> > structure, plus this patch has had more extensive testing.
>
> AFAIK Linux can't dump the threads to the same file as others but doing
> it to different files looks a bit scary. How the system behaves when you
> dump a heavy threaded app with a decent VM [i.e just think about a
> bloatware instead of malicious code]? How will the developer know which
> thread caused the fault? I've found dumping just the faulting thread is
> enough about 100% of the cases especially because [on SMP] others can
> run on and the dump is much more close to "garbage" then usuful info
> from a debug point of view.
Well I strongly dissagre with you - I need to know about all thread -
when I'm
developing my application and it crashes then sometimes thread which
has crashed is undetectable because of completely broken stack (C++
destructors)
- but because I could inspect other threads I know which thread caused
segfault
(also I know in which state other thread have been - locked in mutex or
similar)
So if you think core dumps are garbage - use ulimit and you want ever
see them.
But for me I need all threads - and I like the behaviour of -ac kernel.
bye
kabi@i.am
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-07 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-03 14:54 Don Dugger
2001-05-06 16:47 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-05-07 15:22 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2001-05-07 15:54 ` Don Dugger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AF6BD98.59F714DF@i.am \
--to=kabi@i.am \
--cc=szaka@f-secure.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®