From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 17:37:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 17:36:59 -0400 Received: from cc361913-a.flrtn1.occa.home.com ([24.0.193.171]:5765 "EHLO mirai.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 17:36:53 -0400 Message-ID: <3B0595E4.F662165E@mirai.cx> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 14:36:36 -0700 From: J Sloan Organization: Mirai Consulting X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-ac11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Rival CC: "David S. Miller" , Ronald Bultje , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux scalability? In-Reply-To: <990173560.6346.0.camel@adslgw> <990174686.12881.18.camel@tux.bitfreak.net> <3B0577E0.A4CAF354@mirai.cx> <15109.31311.679701.484140@pizda.ninka.net> <3B057C33.7874AF71@zk3.dec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Rival wrote: > "David S. Miller" wrote: > > > J Sloan writes: > > > Microsoft finally managed to get a better result using > > > an all-out, "bet the farm", "benchmark buster" setup > > > with a special web cache in front of iis. > > > > I haven't heard anyone talk about the fact that their 8-cpu numbers > > got disqualified and aren't even mentioned on the SPEC site on the > > main tables anymore. > > > > Really? I just checked and it's still there from what I see. We're talking > about the Dell 8450/700 w/ IIS & SWC 3.0 result, right? I'm hoping that > they're deemed NC, but I don't see it yet... > IIRC they did have some results disqualified, but them these latest results have been submitted since then - perhaps they will be disqualified as well, once the facts come to light... cu jjs