From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 06:27:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 06:27:40 -0500 Received: from nlaknet.slt.lk ([203.115.0.2]:29109 "EHLO laknet.slt.lk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 06:27:26 -0500 Message-ID: <3C115125.E70E0674@sltnet.lk> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:30:45 -0600 From: Ishan Oshadi Jayawardena X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.14-lightening i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lkml Subject: Fs's affected by smart atime updates Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greetings everyone, I've found out that NTFS and FAT are not affected adversely by the atime update patch by Andrew Morton. (atime resolution in NTFS is 1 hour and in FAT, well, 1 day!). I'd be thankful if anyone could point out which filesystems, if any, are _adversely_ affected by this. Thanks. - ioj