From: Chris Chabot <chabotc@reviewboard.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain
Cc: Mukund Ingle <inglem@cisco.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Quick question on Software RAID support.
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 02:47:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C69C5A6.4020409@reviewboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16aoUH-0003mY-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Alan Cox wrote:
>>1) Does the Software RAID-5 support automatic detection
>> of a drive failure? How?
>>
>
> It sees the commands failing on the underlying controller. Set up a software
> raid 5 and just yank a drive out of a bay if you want to test it
This is also why software raid 5 + IDE is a bad combo. It has a high
chance of locking up the IDE controller, and requiring you to power down
& fix the system before reconstruction can commence. However with SCSI
hot-swapable solutions, on-the-fly reconstruction after failure works
perfectly.
>>2) Has Linux Software RAID-5 been used in the Enterprise environment
>> to support redundancy by any real-world networking company
>> or this is just a tool used by individuals to provide redundancy on
>> their own PCs in the labs and at home?
>>
>
> Dunno about that. I just hack code 8)
I am using software raid 5 and several Dell PowerEdge 2550 servers
(since the hardware raid was to slow for some heavy IO operations), with
great results. We have had 5 seperate disk failures so far, and no
problems what so ever. Either the spare disk kicked right in, or after
adding the new drive, reconstruction work perfectly.
I don't know if 20 PE2550 servers qualifies as a 'enterprise' solution,
but it works great for the kinds of thing we are doing
--Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-13 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-13 1:34 Mukund Ingle
2002-02-13 1:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-13 1:47 ` Chris Chabot [this message]
2002-02-13 4:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-02-13 9:24 ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-13 2:19 ` Rob Landley
2002-02-13 10:33 ` Marco Colombo
2002-02-13 11:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-13 14:25 ` Marco Colombo
2002-02-13 18:30 ` Mark Cooke
2002-02-13 21:33 ` Ville Herva
2002-02-13 21:54 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 22:12 ` Ville Herva
2002-02-15 23:48 ` Mark Cooke
2002-02-16 17:01 ` VIA KT133 (was: Re: Quick question on Software RAID support.) Ville Herva
2002-02-14 19:05 ` Quick question on Software RAID support Pavel Machek
2002-02-13 18:57 ` Thomas Schenk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C69C5A6.4020409@reviewboard.com \
--to=chabotc@reviewboard.com \
--cc=inglem@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®