mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Chabot <chabotc@reviewboard.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain
Cc: Mukund Ingle <inglem@cisco.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Quick question on Software RAID support.
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 02:47:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C69C5A6.4020409@reviewboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16aoUH-0003mY-00@the-village.bc.nu>

Alan Cox wrote:
>>1) Does the Software RAID-5 support automatic detection
>>     of a drive failure? How?
>>
> 
> It sees the commands failing on the underlying controller. Set up a software
> raid 5 and just yank a drive out of a  bay if you want to test it

This is also why software raid 5 + IDE is a bad combo. It has a high 
chance of locking up the IDE controller, and requiring you to power down 
& fix the system before reconstruction can commence. However with SCSI 
hot-swapable solutions, on-the-fly reconstruction after failure works 
perfectly.


>>2) Has Linux Software RAID-5 been used in the Enterprise environment
>>     to support redundancy by any real-world networking company
>>     or this is just a tool used by individuals to provide redundancy on
>>     their own PCs in the labs and at home?
>>
> 
> Dunno about that. I just hack code 8)

I am using software raid 5 and several Dell PowerEdge 2550 servers 
(since the hardware raid was to slow for some heavy IO operations), with 
great results. We have had 5 seperate disk failures so far, and no 
problems what so ever. Either the spare disk kicked right in, or after 
adding the new drive, reconstruction work perfectly.


I don't know if 20 PE2550 servers qualifies as a 'enterprise' solution,

but it works great for the kinds of thing we are doing

	--Chris


  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-13  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-13  1:34 Mukund Ingle
2002-02-13  1:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-13  1:47   ` Chris Chabot [this message]
2002-02-13  4:10     ` Bill Davidsen
2002-02-13  9:24       ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-13  2:19   ` Rob Landley
2002-02-13 10:33   ` Marco Colombo
2002-02-13 11:15     ` Alan Cox
2002-02-13 14:25       ` Marco Colombo
2002-02-13 18:30       ` Mark Cooke
2002-02-13 21:33         ` Ville Herva
2002-02-13 21:54           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 22:12             ` Ville Herva
2002-02-15 23:48               ` Mark Cooke
2002-02-16 17:01                 ` VIA KT133 (was: Re: Quick question on Software RAID support.) Ville Herva
2002-02-14 19:05       ` Quick question on Software RAID support Pavel Machek
2002-02-13 18:57 ` Thomas Schenk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C69C5A6.4020409@reviewboard.com \
    --to=chabotc@reviewboard.com \
    --cc=inglem@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®