Re: [PATCH] Son of Unbork (1 of 3)

[Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>]

Alexander Viro wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> 
> 
>>This three patch set completes the removal of ext2-specific includes from 
>>fs.h.  When this is done, your kernel will compile a little faster, the Ext2 
>>source will be organized a little better, and then infamous fs.h super_block 
>>union will no longer hurt your eyes.  When every filesystem has been changed 
>>in a similar way, fs.h will finally be generic, in-memory super_blocks will be
>>somewhat smaller, and the kernel will compile quite a lot faster.  And peace
>>will come once more to Middle-Earth.  (I made that last part up.)
>>
>>Patch 1 adds alloc_super and destroy_super methods to struct file_system.  A 
>>
> 
> Vetoed.

Poczjemu? Why? It fits the concept of constructor and destructor - I'm 
just curious. I suppose some locking issues?