mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ethan <e-d0uble@stinkfoot.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Segfaulting programs with CONFIG_HIMEM on SMP PowerPC
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 19:46:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CBA14E0.7080600@stinkfoot.org> (raw)

Greetings,

I've noticed recently that kernels >=2.4.18 on my SMP G4 began to say 
this at boottime:
Apr 13 15:03:20 spicymeatball kernel: Memory BAT mapping: BAT2=256Mb, 
BAT3=256Mb, residual: 256Mb
Apr 13 15:03:20 spicymeatball kernel: Warning, memory limited to 512 Mb, 
use CONFIG_HIGHMEM to reach 512 Mb
Apr 13 15:03:20 spicymeatball kernel: Total memory = 512MB; using 2048kB 
for hash table (at c0400000)

This machine has 768M, so I happily checked CONFIG_HIMEM (although I 
thought CONFIG_HIMEM was for systems with >2G but I suppose that only 
applies on x86), recompiled, and got the full 768M.  

Memory BAT mapping: BAT2=256Mb, BAT3=256Mb, residual: 256Mb
Total memory = 768MB; using 2048kB for hash table (at c0400000)
Linux version 2.4.18 (root@spicymeatball) (gcc version 2.95.3 19991030 
(prerelease/franzo/20001125)) #2  SMP Sat Apr 13 15:06:45 EDT 2002

A few hours later, I fired up dig to do a query.. it subsequently dumped 
a core..
I was a little suprised by this.. so I ran it again.. no crash this 
time.  Looking around the system, I found a few more core files.. one 
from bash here, another from sshd there.. it began to get a little 
unnerving.. they all weren't signal 11's either.. Some were SIGILL, some 
were SIGTRAP, etc. odd. So, after deleting the various cores.. I 
rebooted to the non config_himem kernel and tried to get these utilities 
to crash.. no dice.. everything was hunky-dory (except that I only had 
512M..)  How should I proceed here?  So far I've gone back to a 
bitkeeper pull of 2.4.18-pre1, which doesn't ask me to use CONFIG_HIMEM, 
detects all of my memory and seems rock-solid.  Newer kernels that want 
CONFIG_HIMEM all behave the same, with seemingly random coredumping 
executables.
I'm using glibc-2.2.4, gcc version 2.95.3 19991030 
(prerelease/franzo/20001125), BFD 2.11.2

Pleas CC me any replies, as I don't subscribe to the list.

thanks,

Ethan



                 reply	other threads:[~2002-04-14 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CBA14E0.7080600@stinkfoot.org \
    --to=e-d0uble@stinkfoot.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®