From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:02:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:02:24 -0400 Received: from eventhorizon.antefacto.net ([193.120.245.3]:50055 "EHLO eventhorizon.antefacto.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:02:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3CE4E319.8070800@antefacto.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:01:45 +0100 From: Padraig Brady User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dale Farnsworth CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Still no ramfs usage limits in 2.5.9 or 2.4.19-pre8 In-Reply-To: <20020516164926.GA16670@farnsworth.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dale Farnsworth wrote: > David Gibson produced a patch about 18 months ago that added usage limits > to ramfs. > > Through 2.4.10, the AC kernel series carried this patch. > > Linus' kernel from 2.4.11 onward adopted only one line from the > patch, the following attribution comment: > "Usage limits added by David Gibson, Linuxcare Australia." > > The usage limit code is missing, however. > > Was this a simple mistake that has been overlooked? Or are there > drawbacks to applying the patch that keep it out of the mainstream > kernels? > > -Dale Farnsworth Linus said the code should be kept as simple as possible because it's only an example file system. However simple should also not mean practically useless. Also as of 2.5 it's mandatory, so it should get the limit code IMHO. There are also a few other patches floating around for ramfs: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100553363224376&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98701101629272&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100753902321780&w=2 Padraig.