From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Artop update
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 19:30:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CF7B339.3000406@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205311951.35809@enzo.bigblue.local>
Franz Sirl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> finally I was able to test the new driver and except for the "return 0 instead
> of dev-irq" typo all was fine. I added a few minor changes based on the
> discussion with Vojtech though.
Hey cool!
> The hunk to main.c is needed to be able to boot with DEVFS enabled.
Better just don't do devfs :-). But anyway...
Well I'm planing to add kernel version tagging of fstab line enties
to util-linux. This seems to be the only way to make major/minor
transitions (and the more I think about it the more I'm convinced
that they will be unevitable at some not so distant point in time!)
Something along the lines of:
cat /etc/fstab:
/dev/hdc / ext3 v2.4,defaults 1 1
/dev/sda1
/ ext3 v2.5,defaults 1 1
LABEL=/boot /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
/dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto noauto,owner 0 0
# /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 auto noauto,owner 0 0
# /dev/loop2 /mnt/2 auto noauto,owner 0 0
none /proc proc defaults 0 0
none /tmp tmpfs defaults 0 0
none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
/dev/hda6 swap swap defaults 0 0
Would be *very* convenient for this purpose and solve 99.9999% percent
of portability problems. Well the above syntax may be the esiest to
imeplement however the below syntax would be perhaps more palatable:
2.5:/dev/sda1
/ ext3 ....
Opinnions?
perhaps a similar adjustments would be required for the kernel root parameter of
course.
With something along
root=2.5:/dev/sda1,2.4:/dev/hdc
one could be living with... The respecive kernel would just pick the entry
which is matching it's version and be fine.
next parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-31 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200205311951.35809@enzo.bigblue.local>
2002-05-31 17:30 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-05-31 18:53 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-31 18:55 ` Franz Sirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CF7B339.3000406@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®