From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@drugphish.ch>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS (vfs-related) syscall logging
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:39:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D0E10BA.3010604@drugphish.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <shsadpv7y3y.fsf@charged.uio.no>
Hi,
> > I will extend it and add yet another proc-fs variable in
> > /proc/sys/sunrpc/ which will represent a bitmask to selectively
> > enable/disable which syscalls should be logged.
>
>
> Ugh...
>
> The volume of information you propose to log is going to be seriously
> huge and *will* affect performance. It would probably be a lot more
I'm fully aware of that. But we have the problem that we need C2'ish
audit trails and logging facilities. It's a requirement in the company I
work for. Linux unfortunately isn't quite there yet but with the LSM
framework it would be possible. I know that SGI at a certain point had
put a lot of effort into getting something like that into the LSM
framework. I simply can't wait (for that specific NFS requirement) until
it is part of the official kernel tree so I hacked that patch together.
It's easier to forward port my simple patch than to have LSM and a patch.
[Besides all that my boss thinks we can handle the amount of overhead
and the logged data and he pays my check, so I do it. :)]
> efficient to log using 'tcpdump' (and the libpcap binary format)
> instead of all those printks.
Can't do that, company policy and I doubt this would be more efficient
since you need a damn intelligent parser to get the same information
from a packet dump.
But thanks for your input. Maybe you or someone else would be able to
give me a response to my other questions too, if possible. I'd really
appreciate it.
Best regards and thanks for your effort,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-17 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-14 21:21 Roberto Nibali
2002-06-16 20:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-06-17 16:39 ` Roberto Nibali [this message]
2002-06-17 17:13 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-06-18 23:35 ` Roberto Nibali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D0E10BA.3010604@drugphish.ch \
--to=ratz@drugphish.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®