From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [patch] sched-2.5.24-D3, batch/idle priority scheduling, SCHED_BATCH
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:34:16 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D2CB668.8CC739B6@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
Hello.
> > > > And users of __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ and kernel_thread() should not
> > > > have policy == SCHED_BATCH.
> >
> > well, there's one security consequence here - module loading
> > (request_module()), which spawns a kernel thread must not run as
> > SCHED_BATCH. I think the right solution for that path is to set the
> > policy to SCHED_OTHER upon entry, and restore it to the previous one
> > afterwards - this way the helper thread has SCHED_OTHER priority.
>
> i've solved this problem by making kernel_thread() spawned threads drop
> back to SCHED_NORMAL:
Note that request_module() also does waitpid(). So it's better to change
policy upon entry, as You suggested.
> I believe this is the secure way of doing it - independently of
> SCHED_BATCH - a RT task should not spawn a RT kernel thread 'unwillingly'.
Yes, but this semantic change should be ported to all archs
independently of
low level microoptimizations, for consistency. Rename all definitions to
arch_kernel_thread() ?
Btw, how about this tiny bit of cleanup:
asmlinkage void schedule_userspace(void)
{
/*
* Only handle batch tasks that are runnable.
*/
if (current->policy == SCHED_BATCH &&
current->state == TASK_RUNNING) {
runqueue_t *rq = this_rq_lock();
deactivate_batch_task(current, rq);
// we can keep irqs disabled:
spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
}
schedule();
}
Oleg.
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-10 22:34 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-06 18:18 oleg
2002-07-10 19:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-10 19:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-11 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-14 12:29 ` Pavel Machek
2002-07-15 16:31 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-01 9:45 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D2CB668.8CC739B6@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®