From: Kevin Brosius <cobra@compuserve.com>
To: kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Olien <dmo@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] (was Re: [2.5.43] (DAC960 compile failure))
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:11:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB14BED.722CFB06@compuserve.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DAEDBFA.6A8A169B@kns.com>
Dave, all,
Dave and I have made the 2.5.43 patch available for download. You can
find it on my page at:
http://www.user1.netcarrier.com/~kbrosius/pages/mylex.html
This patch allows me to boot 2.5.43 on a dual Athlon system with a Mylex
eXtremeRAID 2000 controller successfully.
Thanks Dave!
Kevin
>
> Hi Dave,
> I'll give it a shot tonight. Did you post the patch to the
> linux-kernel mailing list? I can't find it in the archives. If not,
> would you mail a copy to my home address (compuserve, or have you posted
> it on a web location?) If you'd like me to put up copies of the patch
> for general consumption I'll make space available on a web page.
>
> Kevin
>
> >
> > I just posted a DAC960 patch for 2.5.42. Tomorrow, I'll post
> > a 2.5.43 patch. There are some minor changes needed (about three
> > lines) for 2.5.43. See the patch posting regarding ACPI
> > interactions.
> >
> > I'd love to hear any good or bad results you have with these
> > patches.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Dave Olien
> > Open Source Developement Lab
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:28:07PM -0400, Kevin Brosius wrote:
> > > >
> > > > looking at that i realise that DAC960 code in 2.5.43
> > > > is not supposed to be tested:
> > > > ======
> > > > #error I am a non-portable driver, please convert me to use the \
> > > > Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt interfaces ======
> > > > am i right?
> > > >
> > > > the following weirdo appears in both gcc-3.1 and 3.2 (also in 2.5.42)
> > > > ======
> > > > drivers/block/DAC960.c: In function `DAC960_DetectControllers':
> > > > drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: `Controller' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > > drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: for each function it appears in.)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, 2.5.42 did this also. It looks like gcc 3.2 doesn't like goto's
> > > which reference variables outside their native scope. You can move the
> > > Controller definition to full function scope to fix that error.
> > >
> > > The DAC960 doesn't seem usable out of the stock kernel build though.
> > > You'll need to try patches previously posted to the list. (Which don't
> > > fully work for me either...)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kevin
--
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-19 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-17 15:49 [2.5.43] (DAC960 compile failure) Kevin Brosius
2002-10-19 12:11 ` Kevin Brosius [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DB14BED.722CFB06@compuserve.com \
--to=cobra@compuserve.com \
--cc=dmo@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome