mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mingming cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	manfred@colorfullife.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:17:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB97C90.2DF810E6@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1035555715.3447.150.camel@plars>

Paul Larson wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 18:23, mingming cao wrote:
> > Thanks for your quick feedback.  I did LTP tests on it--it passed(well,
> > I saw a failure on shmctl(), but the failure was there since 2.5.43
> > kernel).  I will do more stress tests on it soon.
> Which shmctl() test is this?  To my knowledge, there are no current
> known issues with shmctl tests.  There is however one with sem02 in
> semctl() that last I heard has been partially fixed in the kernel and
> still needs to be fixed in glibc.  Is that the one you are referring to,
> or is there really some other shmctl test in LTP that is failing?

Here is the failure I saw on LTP test.  The one failed is 
/ltp-20020807/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01

<<<test_start>>>
tag=shmctl01 stime=1035475025
cmdline="shmctl01"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
initiation_status="ok"
<<<test_output>>>
shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
shmctl01    1  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #1
shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
shmctl01    1  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #1
shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
shmctl01    1  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #1
shmctl01    2  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #2
shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
shmctl01    1  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #1
shmctl01    2  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #2
shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
shmctl01    1  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #1
shmctl01    2  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #2
shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
shmctl01    1  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #1
shmctl01    2  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
pass #2
shmctl01    3  FAIL  :  # of attaches is incorrect - 0
shmctl01    4  PASS  :  new mode and change time are correct
<<<execution_status>>>
duration=1 termination_type=exited termination_id=1 corefile=no
cutime=0 cstime=0
<<<test_end>>>

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-25 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-18  0:14 [PATCH]IPC locks breaking down with RCU mingming cao
2002-10-20 13:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-20 17:27   ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-21 18:11     ` mingming cao
2002-10-21 19:00       ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 21:49         ` [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch mingming cao
2002-10-24 22:29           ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 22:56             ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 23:30               ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 23:59                 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-25  0:35                   ` [Lse-tech] " Rick Lindsley
2002-10-25  1:07                     ` Robert Love
2002-10-25  0:07                 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25  0:24                   ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25  4:18                 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25  5:53                   ` mingming cao
2002-10-25  7:27                     ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25  5:36                 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-25 16:53                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-24 23:23             ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 14:21               ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Larson
2002-10-25 17:17                 ` mingming cao [this message]
2002-10-25 18:20                   ` Paul Larson
2002-10-25 18:51                     ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 19:06                       ` Paul Larson
2002-10-25 20:14                         ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 20:23                       ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-25  0:38             ` Cliff White
2002-10-31 17:52             ` [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch [PERFORMANCE RESULTS] Bill Hartner
2002-10-21 19:18       ` [PATCH]IPC locks breaking down with RCU Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-21 19:36         ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-21 19:41         ` mingming cao
2002-10-21 20:14           ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-21 18:07   ` mingming cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DB97C90.2DF810E6@us.ibm.com \
    --to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=plars@linuxtestproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome