From: Peter Waechtler <pwaechtler@mac.com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unified SysV and Posix mqueues as FS
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:05:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DBC6314.6B8AC5EA@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DBC1A6B.7020108@colorfullife.com>
Manfred Spraul schrieb:
>
> > - notification not tested
> > - still linear search in queues
>
> Is that a problem? Receive does one linear search of the queued
> messages, send does one linear search of the waiting receivers. Both
> lists should be short.
>
Yes, they _should_ but don't have to be.
It only matters if you ask for specific priority/type of message.
> Could you split your patch into the functional changes and cleanup?
> (const, size_t, you move a few definitions around, whitespace cleanups)
>
> I don't like the deep integration of the mqueues into the sysv code - is
> that really needed?
> For example, you add the mqueue messages into the sysv array, and then
> add lots of code to separate both again - IPC_RMID cannot remove posix
> queues, etc.
>
> Have you tried to separate both further? Create a ramfs like filesystem,
> store msg_queue in the inode structure?
> The ids array is only for sysv, only the actual message handling is
> shared between sysv msg and posix mqueues
>
I plan to separate the interfaces and just share the message stuff.
But time was getting short. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-27 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-27 16:55 Manfred Spraul
2002-10-27 22:05 ` Peter Waechtler [this message]
[not found] ` <3DBCDF4A.3080709@colorfullife.com>
2002-10-28 10:49 ` Peter Waechtler
2002-10-28 21:39 ` Peter Waechtler
2002-10-28 21:43 ` Manfred Spraul
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-27 15:33 Peter Waechtler
2002-10-27 15:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-27 15:53 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-27 19:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-10-27 22:02 ` Peter Waechtler
2002-10-28 1:54 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-28 10:44 ` Peter Waechtler
2002-10-28 22:18 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DBC6314.6B8AC5EA@mac.com \
--to=pwaechtler@mac.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome