mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Rival <frival@zk3.dec.com>
To: colpatch@us.ibm.com
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] use asm-generic/topology.h
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:42:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DC08A9C.F5B267A8@zk3.dec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DC06CAE.8040806@us.ibm.com>

Matthew Dobson wrote:

> Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> >
> >>use_generic_topology.patch
> >>
> >>This patch changes ppc64 & alpha to use the generic topology.h for the
> >>non-NUMA case rather than redefining the same macros.  It is much easier
> >>to maintain one set of generic non-NUMA macros than several.
> >
> >
> > Looks good from the ppc64 perspective.
> >
> > Anton
>
> Glad to have the positive feedback.  It doesn't really change how
> anything works, just eliminates duplicate code and makes modifying the
> generic behavior simpler.
>
> Anyone that works with alpha want to verify that I haven't inadvertently
> hosed your topology file?
>

I'd say six of one, half-dozen of the other.  I've been working with another
engineer on updated patches that among other things make NUMA work on Alpha
again.  We're also re-working much of the surrounding code, including much of
this file anyway - Marvel uses a much different topology than Wildfire.

It looks fine to me, but realistically the only opinion I can give for real is
a shoulder shrug, as I'm not exactly sure when the code will be ready for
submission.  Actually, the patch looks just like a part of the patch we have
working, just without Marvel support.  Then again, I suppose IBM would have a
hard time doing that, huh? ;)

 - Pete


  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-31  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-30 22:01 Matthew Dobson
2002-10-30 23:31 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-10-30 23:35   ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-31  1:42     ` Peter Rival [this message]
2002-10-31  2:11       ` Matthew Dobson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DC08A9C.F5B267A8@zk3.dec.com \
    --to=frival@zk3.dec.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome