From: Peter Rival <frival@zk3.dec.com>
To: colpatch@us.ibm.com
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] use asm-generic/topology.h
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:42:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DC08A9C.F5B267A8@zk3.dec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DC06CAE.8040806@us.ibm.com>
Matthew Dobson wrote:
> Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> >
> >>use_generic_topology.patch
> >>
> >>This patch changes ppc64 & alpha to use the generic topology.h for the
> >>non-NUMA case rather than redefining the same macros. It is much easier
> >>to maintain one set of generic non-NUMA macros than several.
> >
> >
> > Looks good from the ppc64 perspective.
> >
> > Anton
>
> Glad to have the positive feedback. It doesn't really change how
> anything works, just eliminates duplicate code and makes modifying the
> generic behavior simpler.
>
> Anyone that works with alpha want to verify that I haven't inadvertently
> hosed your topology file?
>
I'd say six of one, half-dozen of the other. I've been working with another
engineer on updated patches that among other things make NUMA work on Alpha
again. We're also re-working much of the surrounding code, including much of
this file anyway - Marvel uses a much different topology than Wildfire.
It looks fine to me, but realistically the only opinion I can give for real is
a shoulder shrug, as I'm not exactly sure when the code will be ready for
submission. Actually, the patch looks just like a part of the patch we have
working, just without Marvel support. Then again, I suppose IBM would have a
hard time doing that, huh? ;)
- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-31 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-30 22:01 Matthew Dobson
2002-10-30 23:31 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-10-30 23:35 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-31 1:42 ` Peter Rival [this message]
2002-10-31 2:11 ` Matthew Dobson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DC08A9C.F5B267A8@zk3.dec.com \
--to=frival@zk3.dec.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome