From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:24:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:24:20 -0500 Received: from adsl-196-233.cybernet.ch ([212.90.196.233]:64463 "HELO mailphish.drugphish.ch") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:24:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3DC0F6E1.8060209@drugphish.ch> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:24:49 +0100 From: Roberto Nibali User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc-Christian Petersen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v2.2.22-2-secure // [PATCH | PATCHSET | FULLKERNEL] References: <200210310057.24743.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> <3DC0DA57.7040900@drugphish.ch> <200210310942.26843.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Marc, > args, you are right. Awfull typo :-( ... What I meant was: > http://www.impsec.org/linux/masquerade/ip_masq_vpn.html So then you would be referring to following patch, right? http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/people/chaffee/patches/ip_masq_vpn-2.2.10-alpha.patch.gz After a quick piercing glance at this patch I'm inclined to believe that this breaks other things like LVS-NAT and possibly asymmetric routing. While all of your patches are not likely to hit the vanilla 2.2.x kernel you might want to warn people using WOLK in conjunction with LVS-NAT and the cited patch above. YMMV of course and testing could prove me wrong. Best regards, Roberto Nibali, ratz p.s.: I still haven't sent you my patches for the 2.2.x kernel ;) -- echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc