Scary costume sent separately in case your spam filters reject it. Reasons to apply: * will more than double linux filesystem performance (see http://www.namesys.com/v4/fast_reiser4.html), this was measured for reading and writing the linux source code tree * applying will allow vm and vfs changes to be tested and benchmarked on what will be the fastest linux fs by a factor of two when 2.6.0 ships * performs all fs operations as an atomic transaction, so that, for instance, write() and truncate() system calls either happen entirely or not at all * creates necessary infrastructure for an atomic fs transaction API (not yet included in Reiser4). * scalable by design to arbitrarily large numbers of CPUs (use per node locks rather than system wide locks) * eliminates fixed size journal area * creates a complete plugin based infrastructure. This will allow folding in such features as constraints and inheritance as easily coded plugins. It will make it possible to implement new security attributes as just files with new plugins. * First installment of an effective competitor to the Microsoft OFS project. No other Linux FS is even trying to provide an alternative to OFS. We are quite excited over having combined such dramatic performance increases with atomic transactions, even better packing of small files, and a plugin infrastructure. This functionality that has killed performance in other filesystems. (BeFS for instance was forced to abandon important parts of its original vision for performance reasons.) You once told me that you agreed that filesystems should have until 6 weeks after VM/VFS stabilizes. I regret that I have the need to remind you of that. Reiser4 could not be ready earlier. The changes we need in the core code are all fairly trivial, exporting functions and the like, I'll let you read the details yourself. I hope that my fellow tribesman will look at the wooly mammoth on my shoulders as I come back from the hunt, forgive me for being late for dinner, think a thought for the poor hungry MS tribe, and help me make a roasting spit.;-) We circulated all of the changes we needed in the core something like two weeks ago, nobody objected, and Andrew Morton actually read through them and ok'd them. Viro and Hellwig of course didn't read them on the first posting, and then waited until today to find something to object to, and complained there wasn't enough time left in today. (Being just as helpful to our integration as with V3....) We will be happy to fix things in the manner the discussion leads to as soon as the discussion resolves, it seems to be still in progress as I write. Reiser4 is clearly labeled as EXPERIMENTAL with notes that it should only be used by developers, benchmarkers, and testers for now. It passes fsx and dbench, it passes mongo.pl for ump, it crashes for mongo.pl smp. We expect it to be suitable for removal of the EXPERIMENTAL label before 2.6.0 ships (when it is suitable to remove it from the rest of the kernel. ;-) ) I'd like to offer you a seminar on Reiser4 if you have time. I am in the US/bayarea for Halloween and next month. (My kids get to try their first Halloween today. I hope your kids have fun too.) I won't send you the other Nikita patches emails as I see you are already reading them. Please consider Nikita to be authorized as the official maintainer of Reiser4 for the next month (until my return to Moscow). Best, Hans