From: P@draigBrady.com
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why does C3 CPU downgrade in kernel 2.4.20?
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 10:19:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DF86299.3080309@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1039640441.18412.24.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 18:51, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>>Is this the CPU in the $200 "Lindows" PC Wal-Mart is selling? I was
>>thinking of one for a low volume router, and it looks as if there are two
>>VIA chips called C3 (or advertizers have hacked the specs).
>
> It is. Its a nice CPU for appliances. FPU is nondescript, integer
> performance is sort of the same as an equivalently clocked celewrong for
> the current Ezra core at least. The older Samuel II core seems a little
> slower.
>
> There is also a subspecies that comes in at 500-600MHz and is designed
> for low power fanless operation (though with a decent sized heatsink the
> same is true for the 1GHz ones).
Although don't try to do this in 1U with 1GHz chips unless you clock
down and reduce the voltage (you need a "fair amount" of free space
above the heatsink to dissipate the heat). Hmm that reminds me I must
complete the auto voltage selection code in cpufreq.
> If you think the Walmart PC is cool take a look at the EPIA board or see
> www.mini-itx.com. 60W for a complete PC
I built a "no moving parts" router thingy in 1U that used max 19W.
You get a nice MTBF (5.25 years for our config) when there's nothing
mechanical as well as a good power saving. The main parts were:
PSU: EOS VLT60-3000 (now celetron)
MB: Advantech PCM9576
CPU: Ezra C3 866a
HD: 64MB compact flash
Pádraig.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-12 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-10 4:02 Joseph
2002-12-10 5:52 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-10 7:22 ` Daniel Egger
2002-12-10 7:24 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-10 7:53 ` Daniel Egger
2002-12-10 12:40 ` Juan Quintela
2002-12-10 15:40 ` Daniel Egger
2002-12-10 16:51 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-10 19:39 ` Daniel Egger
2002-12-10 20:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-10 21:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-11 18:51 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-12-11 19:14 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-11 19:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-11 19:51 ` Joel Jaeggli
2002-12-12 9:17 ` Joseph
2002-12-12 13:33 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-13 6:55 ` Joseph
2002-12-13 11:04 ` Daniel Egger
2002-12-13 11:57 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-11 21:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-12 10:19 ` P [this message]
2002-12-11 13:19 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-11 10:58 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-11 19:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-11 14:59 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-12 18:09 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-14 16:46 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DF86299.3080309@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome