From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH] generic device DMA implementation
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:57:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E0CDABE.7000907@colorfullife.com> (raw)
>
>
>+
>+Consistent memory is memory for which a write by either the device or
>+the processor can immediately be read by the processor or device
>+without having to worry about caching effects.
>
This is not entirely correct:
The driver must use the normal memory barrier instructions even in
coherent memory. Could you copy the section about wmb() from DMA-mapping
into your new documentation?
+
+Warnings: Memory coherency operates at a granularity called the cache
+line width. In order for memory mapped by this API to operate
+correctly, the mapped region must begin exactly on a cache line
+boundary and end exactly on one (to prevent two separately mapped
+regions from sharing a single cache line). Since the cache line size
+may not be known at compile time, the API will not enforce this
+requirement. Therefore, it is recommended that driver writers who
+don't take special care to determine the cache line size at run time
+only map virtual regions that begin and end on page boundaries (which
+are guaranteed also to be cache line boundaries).
+
Noone obeys that rule, and it's not trivial to fix it.
- kmalloc (32,GFP_KERNEL) returns a 32-byte object, even if the cache line size is 128 bytes. The 4 objects in the cache line could be used by four different users.
- sendfile() with an odd offset.
Is it really impossible to work around that in the platform specific code?
In the worst case, the arch code could memcopy to/from a cacheline aligned buffer.
--
Manfred
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-27 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-27 22:57 Manfred Spraul [this message]
2002-12-27 23:55 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-28 0:20 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-12-28 16:26 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-28 17:54 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-12-28 18:13 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-28 18:25 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-12-28 18:40 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-28 20:05 ` Manfred Spraul
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-28 22:19 Adam J. Richter
2002-12-30 23:23 ` David Brownell
2002-12-28 20:11 Adam J. Richter
2002-12-28 15:41 Adam J. Richter
2002-12-28 16:59 ` David Brownell
2002-12-28 3:39 Adam J. Richter
2002-12-30 0:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-28 2:48 Adam J. Richter
2002-12-28 15:05 ` David Brownell
2002-12-27 20:21 David Brownell
2002-12-27 21:40 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-28 1:29 ` David Brownell
2002-12-28 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-28 18:16 ` David Brownell
2002-12-28 1:56 ` David Brownell
2002-12-28 16:13 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-28 17:41 ` David Brownell
2002-12-27 21:47 ` James Bottomley
2002-12-28 2:28 ` David Brownell
2002-12-18 3:01 James Bottomley
2002-12-18 3:13 ` David Mosberger
2002-12-28 18:14 ` Russell King
2002-12-28 18:19 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E0CDABE.7000907@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome