From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 01:15:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 01:15:20 -0500 Received: from curry.ceng.metu.edu.tr ([144.122.171.200]:27288 "EHLO curry.ceng.metu.edu.tr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 01:15:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3E76BCA9.3060902@ceng.metu.edu.tr> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 08:28:57 +0200 From: Mehmet Ersan TOPALOGLU Reply-To: mersan@ceng.metu.edu.tr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: process resident in memory Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am a newbie in kernel programming. And am sorry if something related previously asked. I wonder if it is possible to following situation is possible or not. let say i have a user process p1. p1 does some malloc, and file i/o etc i initiate it during boot time. it stays resident in memory as if kernel it self (??) and its priority is very very high -- - mersan mersan@ceng.metu.edu.tr mersan@metu.edu.tr LIFE WORTH LIVING WITHOUT YOU?