Andrew Morton wrote:
> george anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
> 
>>I found a problem with the last version.  The attached is for 
>>2.5.65-1.1171 (i.e. after the other post 2.5.65 changes).  The bug is 
>>fixed, and theAndrew Morton wrote:
 > george anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
 >
 >>I found a problem with the last version.  The attached is for
 >>2.5.65-1.1171 (i.e. after the other post 2.5.65 changes).  The bug is
 >>fixed, and the code even simpler here.
 >
 >
 > Thanks, I'll queue that up after Tim's stuff is merged.

And this removes the defered queue in favor of just moving the list 
time update to just prior to the repeat label.  (Apply after my 
"bumps" patch.)

Do I have the right Andrea?
 >
 >

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
  code even simpler here.
> 
> 
> Thanks, I'll queue that up after Tim's stuff is merged.
> 
> 

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml