From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 02:57:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 02:57:26 -0500 Received: from dial-ctb05128.webone.com.au ([210.9.245.128]:49162 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 02:57:25 -0500 Message-ID: <3E8A9A83.1070704@cyberone.com.au> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 18:08:35 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030327 Debian/1.3-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Axboe CC: Con Kolivas , Andrew Morton , linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.66-mm2 with contest References: <200304021324.10799.kernel@kolivas.org> <3E8A6227.7080209@cyberone.com.au> <20030402074227.GH901@suse.de> <3E8A97D6.3000603@cyberone.com.au> <20030402075822.GB2925@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20030402075822.GB2925@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: >On Wed, Apr 02 2003, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>Thanks for doing that, Jens. Any CPU measurements on the hash >>goodness that you did for deadline? >> > >Nope none yet, in fact Andrew's profile numbers show very little time >spent inside the io scheduler hash as it is. It feels like the right >thing to do though, even if the hash doesn't eat that much time. > I agree - especially as we want a smaller hash and with more requests.