mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Balram Adlakha <b_adlakha@softhome.net>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel source tree splitting
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 10:28:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB15946.4000506@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030501172238.GA13756@localhost.localdomain>

Balram Adlakha wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 07:54:03AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:

>> I have seven source trees on disk right now.  Getting rid off all
>>the archs but i386 would not only save tons of space, it would also
>>make 'grep -r' go faster and stop spewing irrelevant hits for archs
>>that I couldn't care less about.

> 
> I agree with you. Making different trees for different archs will make the tarball much smaller. Usually people only use one architecture and the other code lies waste. I think this has been discussed many times but It really is worth doing.

How about a script to just prune it once you download it.  That will at least fix your
disk space & grep issue, and will not affect those of us who like to see it all.

If you want to save download bandwidth, just use incremental diffs and/or something
like bk or one of the cvs exports.

Ben


> -- 


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>       <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc      http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD:  http://scry.wanfear.com     http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear



  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-01 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-01 11:54 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-01 14:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-01 14:20   ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 14:35     ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-01 14:43       ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 15:01       ` Larry McVoy
2003-05-01 15:11         ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-01 17:22 ` Balram Adlakha
2003-05-01 17:28   ` Ben Greear [this message]
2003-05-01 20:03     ` John Bradford
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-01 16:00 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-30 23:46 rmoser
2003-05-01  0:21 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-01  0:44   ` rmoser
2003-05-01  2:51     ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-01 10:13       ` rmoser
2003-05-01  0:52   ` Larry McVoy
2003-05-01  1:00     ` rmoser
2003-05-01 17:28     ` James H. Cloos Jr.
2003-05-01  4:10   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-01  6:14     ` Ed Sweetman
2003-05-01  6:14       ` Peter Riocreux
2003-05-02  0:09   ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-02  0:41     ` rmoser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EB15946.4000506@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=b_adlakha@softhome.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®