Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 04:39:28PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> 
>>Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>>>USB_GADGET is still selectable even with USB disabled. It seems the 
>>>following is intended:
>>
>>This is wrong.
>>
>>CONFIG_USB has always represented the master/host side ... while
>>CONFIG_USB_GADGET represents just the slave/gadget side.
>>
>>The two are completely independent.  Hardware that supports
>>one will typically _not_ support the other.  And systems
>>that support [only] the slave/gadget side will have no use at all
>>for the 100KB+ of "usbcore".
>>...
> 
> 
> Well, CONFIG_USB_GADGET without CONFIG_USB gives me the following link 
> error in 2.5.70-mm3:

As I had already said (in response to your email that reported
that problem), the fix is to revert the recent changeset that
links gadget code twice.  Here's a patch that undoes it.

- Dave