From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263280AbTH0Jrk (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2003 05:47:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263275AbTH0Jrk (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2003 05:47:40 -0400 Received: from gw-nl5.philips.com ([212.153.235.109]:24506 "EHLO gw-nl5.philips.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263280AbTH0JqY (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2003 05:46:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3F4C7E3D.3040403@basmevissen.nl> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:47:41 +0200 From: Bas Mevissen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk Cc: "J.A. Magallon" , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ram=F3n_Rey_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vicente=3F=3F=3F=3F?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: linux-2.4.22 released References: <200308251148.h7PBmU8B027700@hera.kernel.org> <20030825132358.GC14108@merlin.emma.line.org> <1061818535.1175.27.camel@debian> <20030825211307.GA3346@werewolf.able.es> <20030825222215.GX7038@fs.tum.de> In-Reply-To: <20030825222215.GX7038@fs.tum.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Where's the problem with letting people switch from 2.4 to 2.6 and later > from OSS to ALSA? > > Since OSS is still present in 2.6 I don't see any migration problems. > You can also reason the oter way around: Why not include ALSA in 2.4 and let people phase out OSS already before 2.6? OSS can still be present in 2.4, so there are no migration problems in 2.6. Bas.