From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262630AbTIHQAE (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:00:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262634AbTIHQAE (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:00:04 -0400 Received: from dyn-ctb-210-9-244-100.webone.com.au ([210.9.244.100]:50185 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262630AbTIHQAA (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:00:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3F5CA77E.6050104@cyberone.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 01:59:58 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel Subject: Nick's scheduler policy v14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi everyone, kerneltrap gave me a more permanent place to host my patches. http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v14/ I'm starting to attack SMP and NUMA balancing, which is silly because I only have a 2xSMP to test on (I'll try to get some NUMA time from OSDL). I have provided rollups with and without the "core policy". Everything else consists of cleanups and balancing changes, so its probably what SMP/NUMA testers will want to use to start with.