From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263892AbTIICt1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:49:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263893AbTIICt1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:49:27 -0400 Received: from [203.221.72.196] ([203.221.72.196]:17924 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263892AbTIICt0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:49:26 -0400 Message-ID: <3F5D3EA5.9080900@cyberone.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 12:44:53 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Hansen CC: Mike Sullivan , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: I/O degredation with AS on 2.6.0-test3 References: <1063052763.29025.100.camel@nighthawk> In-Reply-To: <1063052763.29025.100.camel@nighthawk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Hansen wrote: >You might want to try Martin Bligh's diffprofile utility. It's a bit >hard to compare 2 500-line profiles without it. > >ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/tools/ > >Also, there have evidently been a few I/O scheduler fixes since -test3. >Please retry with -test5. > More important, are they regressions vs. previous kernels with AS?