It is easier to review the patch if you can actually read the patch ;)

Felipe

Felipe W Damasio wrote:
>     Hi Rusty,
> 
>     Patch against 2.6-test5.
> 
>     Kills an unneeded set_current_state after schedule_timeout, since it 
> already guarantees that the task will be TASK_RUNNING.
> 
>     Also, when setting the state to TASK_RUNNING, isn't that memory 
> barrier unneeded? Patch removes this memory barrier too.
> 
>     If it looks good, please consider applying.
> 
>     Thanks.
> 
> Felipe
>