From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@quark.didntduck.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant.
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:30:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F7728A8.5030602@quark.didntduck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309281121470.15408-100000@home.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Brian Gerst wrote:
>
>>Use machine_check_vector in the entry code instead.
>
>
> This is wrong. You just lost the "asmlinkage" thing, which means that it
> breaks when asmlinkage matters.
>
> And yes, asmlinkage _can_ matter, even on x86. It disasbles regparm, for
> one thing, so it makes a huge difference if the kernel is compiled with
> -mregparm=3 (which used to work, and which I'd love to do, but gcc has
> often been a tad fragile).
>
> Linus
>
Good point. Wouldn't it just be better to change the few handlers to
asmlinkage instead? Having that stub function there is pointless.
--
Brian Gerst
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-28 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-28 16:29 Brian Gerst
2003-09-28 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-28 18:30 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2003-09-28 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-28 18:44 ` Brian Gerst
2003-09-28 19:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-09-29 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-29 19:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-29 19:54 ` -mregparm=3 (was " Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 8:28 ` Helge Hafting
2003-09-30 15:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-29 20:20 ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-09-29 20:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-29 21:36 ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-09-29 21:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-29 21:43 ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-09-29 21:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-09-30 0:24 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-30 4:49 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 4:55 ` Robert Love
2003-09-30 14:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 15:48 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F7728A8.5030602@quark.didntduck.org \
--to=bgerst@quark.didntduck.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®