From: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: [BUG][PATCH] fs/binfmt_elf.c:load_elf_binary() doesn't verify interpreter arch
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:04:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F8F07FA.1030006@vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1000 bytes --]
In fs/binfmt_elf.c:load_elf_binary() (both 2.6 and 2.4), there is some minimal
checking whether the interpreter it's about to load/run is a valid ELF file,
but it fails to check whether the interpreter is of the correct arch.
We ran into this when a borked powerpc64-linux toolchain set the interpreter
on our 64-bit app to our 32-bit ld.so. Executing the app caused the kernel to
really chew up memory. I'm assuming x86_64 and sparc64 might possibly see
the same behavior.
A patch against 2.6 is attached below for review (although it applies with some
fuzz on 2.4). Note I'm not sure of the history behind INTERPRETER_AOUT, so I
added the test for INTERPRETER_ELF so as not to change it's behavior in case
someone still relies on it.
As an aside, it seems the elf_check_arch() macros should really be checking
for more than a valid e_machine value. I'd think checking one or more of the
e_ident[EI_CLASS], e_ident[EI_DATA] and e_ident[EI_OSABI] values would be
required as well, no?
Peter
[-- Attachment #2: binfmt_elf.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 557 bytes --]
--- linux-2.5-orig/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2003-10-16 13:35:24.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.5/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2003-10-16 15:23:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -602,6 +602,10 @@
// printk(KERN_WARNING "ELF: Ambiguous type, using ELF\n");
interpreter_type = INTERPRETER_ELF;
}
+ /* Verify the interpreter has a valid arch */
+ if ((interpreter_type == INTERPRETER_ELF) &&
+ !elf_check_arch(&interp_elf_ex))
+ goto out_free_dentry;
} else {
/* Executables without an interpreter also need a personality */
SET_PERSONALITY(elf_ex, ibcs2_interpreter);
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-16 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-16 21:04 Peter Bergner [this message]
2003-10-16 21:30 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F8F07FA.1030006@vnet.ibm.com \
--to=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®