From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262069AbTJXI04 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 04:26:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262072AbTJXI04 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 04:26:56 -0400 Received: from smtp13.eresmas.com ([62.81.235.113]:25310 "EHLO smtp13.eresmas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262069AbTJXI0v (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 04:26:51 -0400 Message-ID: <3F989C0B.9040309@wanadoo.es> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:27:07 +0200 From: Xose Vazquez Perez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: gl, es, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel , linux-scsi Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.23-pre8: link error with both megaraid drivers References: <3F97F35D.30101@wanadoo.es> <20031023195223.GI11807@fs.tum.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.63.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:27:25PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> IMO this patch makes a better job. It only allows one in kernel, >> and it allows two modules at same time. > My patch allows this, too, or what did I miss? Nothing. But your patch adds too much complex code to do a single thing ;-) > The difference between your and my patch is that your patch doesn't > allow one in kernel plus the other one modular. Yes. And IMO there is not need to build a module when you get the other statically inside the kernel. I can not imagine what will happen if one is statically inside the kernel and someone try to load a module :-) -- HTML mails are going to trash automatically