From: "M.H.VanLeeuwen" <vanl@megsinet.net>
To: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test8 ISAPNP ne.c initialization
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:04:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FA7418B.3A6F83BF@megsinet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031103234311.GE16854@neo.rr.com>
Adam Belay wrote:
>
> How about something like this? (untested)
I had the same reservation with re-ordering inits...
Removed my patch, added this one, compiled and booted; works for me.
Thanks,
Martin
>
> The patch removes the legacy probing function from dev.c and gives it its
> own initcall later in the cycle. Any testing would be appreciated. I
> also have some patches that update the probing code in some of these
> drivers so that they don't have to use legacy techniques but they need
> to be updated to test9. This fix is probably the least intrusive.
>
> --- a/drivers/net/Space.c 2003-10-25 18:42:56.000000000 +0000
> +++ b/drivers/net/Space.c 2003-11-01 22:15:01.000000000 +0000
> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@
> extern int loopback_init(void);
>
> /* Statically configured drivers -- order matters here. */
> -void __init probe_old_netdevs(void)
> +int __init net_olddevs_init(void)
> {
> int num;
>
> @@ -450,8 +450,12 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_LTPC
> ltpc_probe();
> #endif
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> +device_initcall(net_olddevs_init);
> +
> /*
> * The @dev_base list is protected by @dev_base_lock and the rtln
> * semaphore.
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h 2003-10-25 18:44:45.000000000 +0000
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h 2003-11-01 22:11:04.000000000 +0000
> @@ -494,7 +494,6 @@
> extern struct net_device *dev_base; /* All devices */
> extern rwlock_t dev_base_lock; /* Device list lock */
>
> -extern void probe_old_netdevs(void);
> extern int netdev_boot_setup_add(char *name, struct ifmap *map);
> extern int netdev_boot_setup_check(struct net_device *dev);
> extern struct net_device *dev_getbyhwaddr(unsigned short type, char *hwaddr);
> --- a/net/core/dev.c 2003-10-25 18:43:39.000000000 +0000
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c 2003-11-02 16:10:51.000000000 +0000
> @@ -3007,8 +3007,6 @@
>
> dev_boot_phase = 0;
>
> - probe_old_netdevs();
> -
> open_softirq(NET_TX_SOFTIRQ, net_tx_action, NULL);
> open_softirq(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ, net_rx_action, NULL);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-04 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10009211329001.1627-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
2003-10-23 3:18 ` [BUG somewhere] 2.6.0-test8 irq.c, IRQ_INPROGRESS ? M.H.VanLeeuwen
2003-10-23 3:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-23 3:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-23 11:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-10-23 11:30 ` Mikael Pettersson
2003-10-23 14:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-23 4:30 ` [PATCH] 2.6.0-test8 ISAPNP ne.c initialization M.H.VanLeeuwen
2003-11-03 23:43 ` Adam Belay
2003-11-04 6:04 ` M.H.VanLeeuwen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FA7418B.3A6F83BF@megsinet.net \
--to=vanl@megsinet.net \
--cc=ambx1@neo.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome