From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com>,
Paul Venezia <pvenezia@jpj.net>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext3 performance inconsistencies, 2.4/2.6
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:00:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FA82161.9000507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311041335200.20373-100000@home.osdl.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Don't ask me why. But I'm cc'ing Uli, who can probably tell us. Maybe the
> RH-9 libraries are just not very good, and LinuxThreads has had a lot
> longer to optimize their lock behaviour..
I don't see any verison numbers mentioned. If you want to benchmark
NPTL use the recent code, e.g., from Fedora Core 1 or RHEL3. Nothing
else makes any sense since there have mean countless changes since the
early releases.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/qCFh2ijCOnn/RHQRApi1AKCaU7vBtJsATDmx2dStMYishtbF9wCaAvOe
kNaoizj4xtUNU4TV2wH5GAw=
=0kb0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-04 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-04 19:10 Paul Venezia
2003-11-04 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-04 20:20 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2003-11-04 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-04 21:07 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-04 21:28 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2003-11-04 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-04 22:00 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2003-11-04 22:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-04 23:48 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-11-04 23:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-05 0:58 ` jlnance
2003-11-05 7:08 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-11-04 22:19 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2003-11-04 22:26 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2003-11-05 7:14 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-11-04 21:39 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FA82161.9000507@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pvenezia@jpj.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®